On Tue 29 May 2012, yuji sakai wrote: > Cheating, I believe, has a connotation of one bypassing the norms to > gain undue advantage over others. To that, I refuse to admit that > what I did earlier was cheating. As I have said, I had no intention > of disrupting this message board. It was a careless mistake on my > part.
Don't worry: I don't think Mojca was accusing you of deceit. ‘Cheating’ is sometimes used in a looser sense to mean doing something the easy way rather than the official way. I'm sure that that's what was meant here. Using reply-to for new messages is an understandable mistake that I've seen on many mailing lists. For people not using threaded mail-readers, it doesn't make any apparent difference. For the rest of us, however, it messes up the conversations quite noticeably. I'll add something to http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Mailing_Lists about it, since it seems we already have some useful guidelines there. Pont ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
