Hello, IMHO - ConTeXt topics, questions and answers are usually to long to be shrunk to 140 characters.
I think that the "ConTeXt Point" already exists - it's this forum and wiki (you'll see in the future that two sources are enough sometimes). The more sources (including twits), the more searching, and often the more trying. So that's just my opinion. (And - I don't use any "social network" so far (FB, Twitter, G+, ...), so maybe I'm not the right person to judge pluses and minuses of Ctx on Twitter). Lukas On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:02:00 +0200, Bill Meahan <wmeaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hopefully, this is not (too far) OT. I'm not sure how many on the list use Twitter but if you do, you still might not be aware of the daily "TeXTip" tweets. These contain a URL to one place on the web or another that have something to do with TeX/LaTeX usage. I'm thinking it would be great to have a daily "ConTeXtTip" tweet as well. Am I the only one? I'm way too much of a ConTeXt newbie or I'd do it myself. Of course, I _could_ serve as the Point Of Context and do the actual Tweeting of URLs or tips that fit into 140 characters that were emailed to me. If this is too far OT, my most profound apologies to the members of the list and especially the list masters.
-- Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:l...@pontex.cz] Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pon...@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz] Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Tel: +420 244 062 238 Fax: +420 244 461 038 ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
