Thanks - see my first post for a link to a web folder where you can find the 
.tex file, the .pdf context produces, two screenshots of the differing image 
treatment and two of the image files shown in the screenshots. 


Guy Stalnaker
jstal...@wisc.edu
jimmyg...@gmail.com

On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Sietse Brouwer <sbbrou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Guy Stalnaker <jstal...@wisc.edu> wrote:
>> I get the same results using texexec and context which means, if I 
>> understand rightly, I have used both MkII and MkIV.
> 
> Yes, this is correct.
> 
>> Interestingly I get similar results using oft as the pandit output.
> 
> That does suggest it might be something in the image metadata, too. Is
> the image file something you can share? If so, perhaps you could share
> it on the list as an attachment (this mailing list allows
> attachments), so we could have a go at getting it to work ourselves.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sietse
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to