On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Sietse Brouwer <sbbrou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I liked the bit where Dave asked about the process
> Mari's company uses, and that Mari also went into the issue of "so
> *we* use it, but how do we deal with others who don't use it?"

Could you tell that I've had that discussion more than once? Sometimes
I really wonder how difficult it is to understand the sentence "The
original format is *not* a Word (or indeed word processor) document".

"Remind me again why we use this strange and difficult system" is
another all-time favourite that pops up regularly. [The answers are
given in the interview, in case you are reading just this message
without checking out the links.]

Yes, short-term it may appear difficult in an average office
environment. Long-term, I still think ConTeXt was and is the best
alternative out of the available options because of its versatility.
The requirements have changed over the years and will change again - I
foresee tablet-sized interactivity in the near future - but  I have
not needed new tools, just to learn new ways of using what I have. And
the first ConTeXt files I wrote still mostly work; they may need a
little bit of fiddling before compiling on MkIV, but a lot less than
what a structured Word2000 file needs on Word2010 (e.g. TOCs have a
tendency to go bad between versions, figure placement can also be
tricky).


A lot of patience, some fighting spirit (and maybe a bit of luck) is
required if one plans to go the same way, but it can be done and
should be considered as one option among other possibilities.


Regards,

Mari
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to