Hi,
as of actual need I summed up all kinds of formula numbering - some
basics are working. You can find this list on my user talk page:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User_talk:Zenlima
As I also found a note in str-math.mkiv that it needs to be rewritten
and the example syntax which leaded me to confusion in the past, I
worked out a suggestion for a more intuitive syntax for formula
numbering.
In sum it ends with:
All three commands:
\NR
\placeformula
\formualanumber
will share the same attributes:
* sublevel (maybe better: formulalevel or just level?)
to define and concrete the (sub-)level of the formula
* listlabel (maybe textlabel? the numberlabel is still needed)
to add a entry in the list of formulas
* reference
just a classic reference in order to link to it
so that the syntax is more intuitive during the writing.
Also. this way the commands:
placesubformula
placenamedformula
placenamedsubformula
startstopsubformulas
subformulanumber
will become needless.
For the "why" and examples please look at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User_talk:Zenlima#Suggestion_for_new_syntax
I hope you will find parts you like and feel free to add your
opinion. :-)
H.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
