On Feb 19, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > No, that's not a good reference. Please read http://w3fools.com/ and refere > to an actual reference like http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements or > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element
It seems it's a bit more complex than that. One article which seemed even-handed: http://readwrite.com/2011/01/17/w3schools-responds-to-w3fools and some valid discussion at: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/120621/w3fools-alternatives William -- William Adams senior graphic designer Fry Communications Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
