On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Otared Kavian <ota...@gmail.com> wrote: > However, on page 27, there is a sentence which I disagree with… > You say there: > « ConTEXt is always considered somewhat less math savvy than for instance > LaTEX », > but actually I cannot see any example of maths typesetting which cannot be > done in ConTeXt. > It is true that most mathematicians may not use ConTeXt, but this is because > they are not aware of the package and, mainly, because maths >journals do not > accept yet papers typeset with ConTeXt. I hope this will change soon. It's true that "ConTEXt is always considered less math savy than LaTeX" not that "ConTEXt is less math savy than LaTeX".
-- luigi ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
