Since the question has been raised about understanding \define, etc.
indeed some use remains a bit unclear (to me).
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:34:48 +0200
Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
> there is a commented blob that implements thinsg like this
>
> \starttext
> \define[2]\whatevera{#1+#2}
> \whatevera{A}{B}
> \define[me][too][2]\whateverb{#1+#2+#3+#4}
> \whateverb[A]{B}{C}
> \whateverb[A][B]{C}{D}
> \define[alpha][beta][gamma][delta]\whateverc{#1+#2+#3+#4}
> \whateverc[P][Q]
> \stoptext
>
> but it's just an old idea.
I am perhaps a bit bewildered today... but I do not understand the
above. It gets too tricky for me!
In fact, I do not understand well the handling of arguments,
especially optional variants.
For example,
\define[1]\Index{\index{#1}#1}
can be handy. But let's say that I want to be able to use a variant:
\Index[alpha]{$\alpha$}
(\index[alpha]{$\alpha$}$\alpha$)
Or, maybe, I might like to handle authors:
\define[2]\Author{\index{#2, #1}#1 #2}
\Author{Thomas A.}{Schmitz}
But what if I were to type \Author{Aristotle}?
Alan
P.S. I indeed like the idea of the suggestion:
\define[one,two,three]\whatever{first: #one second: #two third: #three}
On 4/16/2013 11:10 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> It certainly isn't an urgent need, but having
>
> \define[one,two,three]
>
> wouldn't be absurd, now would it?
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
