On 2013–08–25 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > The \starttexdefintion command looks for the “unexpanded” keyword > only when you apply also a argument but not when the arguments > are missing, i.e.
Thanks for the explanation. Is that a bug or expected behaviour?
I think it's odd that
\unexpanded\def\foo{}
and
\starttexdefintion unexpanded foo
\stoptexdefinition
don't behave the same.
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
