On 2014-02-05, 7:41, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > Hi all, > > just a thought. Some time ago wise people decided to include TeXworks > into TeXlive, so that newbies installing TeXlive can get a > "batteries-included" package (not having to choose/install an editor). > Would it be (a) reasonable and (b) not too much time-consuming to do a > similar move with ConTeXt standalone?
I think, people who want a batteries-included distribution should install TeXlive, which also includes ConTeXt. In my opinion, it's great to have ConTeXt Standalone as a more lightweight package that doesn't include all the stuff I don't need. There is also a Wiki page with informations about editors and their ConTeXt support, which I think should be enough for the strange users that don't have an editor yet (or for users looking for an editor with better ConTeXt support). Kind regards, Joshua Krämer ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
