On 2014-03-05 10:54, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 05.03.2014 um 16:18 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster
<schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com <mailto:schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com>>:
Am 05.03.2014 um 16:07 schrieb Rik Kabel <cont...@rik.users.panix.com
<mailto:cont...@rik.users.panix.com>>:
striplong
It would be nice if striplong worked, but the example fails when
string.striplong is used in place of string.strip. The log says:
! LuaTeX error [string "\directlua "]:1: attempt to call field
'striplong' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
[string "\directlua "]:1: in main chunk.
Is the format of the call different than shown in the wiki, or is a
different mechanism required to quote a potentially long string?
The name of the function is "strings.striplong".
This should be "utilities.strings.striplong" but it has no effect
because when take a look
at the saved string in Lua you can see that blank lines are removed
from the text.
Wolfgang
Indeed. This does build without error, but the
utilities.strings.striplong result is worse than the string.strip
result, with some additional whitespace at the end of the test string
from the earlier example.
So, is this a confirmed bug?
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
