Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> writes: >> So \triangle is a math ord and \bigtriangleup a math bin. >> >> For compatibility, that should probably stay true in ConTeXt too---even >> the low placement of \bigtriangledown, which I don't understand but >> which does reproduce plain TeX's placement. > > why? if compatibility means 'not useable' we should fix it
Thus, a question for the purer mathematicians on the list: Are there uses for the lower placement of \bigtriangledown? As a physicists, I have used that shape only for the gradient operator (for which one has \nabla). But maybe it is used in, say, category theory with a lower placement? -Sanjoy ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
