On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Jan Tosovsky <j.tosov...@email.cz> wrote:
> On 2014-05-15 luigi scarso wrote: > > On 5/14/2014 10:21 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > > > I've finished a rough comparision of various engines for > > > their typographical quality: http://drifted.in/publishing/ > > > > Another point could be the "server" property... the swiglib project is > > an attempt to cover this side > > > > https://swiglib.foundry.supelec.fr/ > > I am sad seeing lot of technical details without single sentence covering > benefits for the end user... > > It depends on the "end user" term. It's the other side of digital typography: high speed of "low quality" jobs, where the core is the automatic workflow and the "end user" is often a "traditional programmer" . -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
