On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 06/22/2014 10:40 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >>> [...] >>> How about increasing the timeout to 600 seconds? >> >> We can, but then at least we need to make a rough calculation of what >> transfer speed should still be supported. And no matter what value we >> use, it will break for people (I also get a lot of "memory limit >> exceeded" warnings in the logs, without even having any significant >> number of users). The repository is currently a bit below 100 MiB. >> >> And if I put a complete distribution into the repository as intended, >> we could probably set the time limit to a few days ;) > > GitHub is then fine.
No, it's not. They'll kick us out once we start putting gigabytes of binaries on their site. >>>> And maybe create a project at GitHub, but "context" is already >>>> taken. >>> >>> Also contextgarden is already taken at GitHub. >> >> Indeed. >> >> http://github.com/contextgarden/context > > Sorry, I overlooked that this was ConTeXt. You couldn't have know it. I have put the repository there after you asked. And there was not any description there earlier. >>> context is taken at Bitbucket, but not contexgarden. How about Bitbucket? >> >> I need to make an account first. > > Well, my previous question doesn’t make sense, if GitHub has a ConTeXt repo. It still does if some users are addicts of BitBucket ;) In any case it would make sense to update the repository on Gitorious at some point. Mojca ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
