There appears to be an inconsistency in the implementation of
\startparagraph. When it is used with one argument (or two by my reading
of the source) it defines \stopparagraph with a terminal \endgraf, yet
with no arguments this is not done. Strangely (to me) it also appears to
insert a line-break before \startparagraph[]. The example below
demonstrates these issues.
I would expect to have \endgraf inserted with each \stopparagraph
regardless of the argument count.
There is also a wiki issue with overloading of the command name
\startparagraph. The existing command entry points to the paragraphs
mechanism for setting up parallel paragraphs in columns. There is also a
\startParagraph command described for the t-pararef module. There is no
mention of \startparagraph in the \startsection page, which might be an
appropriate place. Perhaps some Wikipedia-style disambiguation mechanism
is needed.
\starttext
\startparagraph
One
\stopparagraph
\startparagraph
Twee
\stopparagraph
\startparagraph
Drie
\stopparagraph
\startparagraph[]
One
\stopparagraph
\startparagraph
Twee
\stopparagraph
\startparagraph
Drie
\stopparagraph
\stoptext
--
Rik Kabel
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
