Re: [NTG-context] \setuphead[part] - special look

Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:07:46 -0700 

Hello,

one more question.

When I place \part into \...bodymatter and \...appendices, the \part in body matter yields "Díl " + number, which 
is OK, but in appendices it gives "<nothing>" + Roman number ("I", "II", ...).

What is the most systemic to \setuphead[part] to give "Díl..." in body matter and "Dodatek..." in appendices, and also 
to get letter numbering ("A", "B"...) in appendices (so "Dodatek A", "Doadatek B", ...)?

A sample source code with body matter and appendices is attached...

Best regards,

Lukas


On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:28:46 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster 
<schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote:




Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. <mailto:l...@pontex.cz>
23. Juni 2015 09:45
Hello,

I'm really satisfied with the way you coded the part page layout.

I've modified a bit your code - just to highlight the dependencies
(rendering setup, makeup and so on; if anyone interested, see the
attachment).

You can drop the \definebodyfontenvironment line when you use
\definefont to set the part fonts, e.g.

\definefont[PartText][SerifBold sa 5]
\setuphead[part][textstyle=PartText]


On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:36:03 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
<schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote:


This method to set your own layout is also used by other command (e.g.
the list mechanism used for the table of contents) and the
\defineheadplacement has also a alternative key which is needed when you
want an inline heading (e.g. \setuphead[...][alternative=text]).


...


The necessary key would be endless with each new layout and with the
\defineheadplacement command to create your own without adding
additional keys but you can also use the command key instead of
\defineheadplacement. The advantage of \defineheadplacement is that you
can better structure the code in the setups environment because you
don't have to worry about spaces.

Wolfgang


As "\defineheadplacement" is concerned:

You mentioned this command in your response, but
"\defineheadplacement" is used nowhere in your code and there is no
info about on wiki.

Could you provide a MWE how \defineheadplacement is supposed to be used?

You shouldn't use it because Hans kept it only for backwards
compatibility and \defineheadplacement is the better alternative. You
can also use the same rendering (the content of the setups environment)
for different head alternatives where you set the differences with the
\defineheadalternative command.

% HeadA

\defineheadplacement[HeadA][vertical]#1#2%
   {\startframedtext
      #1\quad #2%
    \stopframedtext}

\definehead[HeadA][section][alternative=HeadA]

% HeadB

\defineheadalternative[HeadB][renderingsetup=HeadB] % alternative=vertical

\startsetups[HeadB]
   \startframedtext
     \headnumbercontent \qquad \headtextcontent
   \stopframedtext
\stopsetups

\definehead[HeadB][section][alternative=HeadB]

\starttext

\HeadA{Knuth}

\input knuth

\HeadB{Tufte}

\input tufte

\stoptext

Wolfgang




--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o.      | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4

Tel: +420 241 096 751
Fax: +420 244 461 038

Attachment: Ull-Gra.test2.mkiv
Description: Binary data

Attachment: Ull-Gra.test2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to