On 02/22/2016 08:13 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/21/2016 8:54 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> I’m afraid there is a regression partially displayed in the following
>> code:
>
> btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should
> make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes should
> be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are not
> clever enough for that
Sorry, Hans, in my case I don’t provide two versions (print and screen),
because I should provide in some cases (from some texts I distribute
[this are only the PDF files, besides ePub and Kindle files]):
- A4 booklet without footnotes.
- A4 booklet with footnotes.
- Letter booklet without footnotes.
- Letter booklet with footnotes,
- A4 portrait as screen copy.
I I add (even) a screen version, the user will be confused. Booklets are
to be printed.
And at work, I want people to be able to read (not in full) on screen
what they may also print in booklet form.
With a screen version, users will be lost, more than helped.
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
