On 03/12/2016 01:53 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:36:01 +0100 Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> I can hardly imagine the sense in the point you’re making. (Sorry, it >> must be my fault.) > > Think about including source in another source, for example. > > Say one has an article that becomes a book, or gets included in a book, > or the book gets parts. In the course of writing, one might decide to > add an additional level of structure and not want to change all of the > \start...\stop structure definitions. > > In fact, using fixed section, subsection, subsubsection is a bit > antiquated, isn't it?
Many thanks for your reply, Alan. The usual suspect was found guilty: it was my fault not realizing that fixed sectioning commands are outdated. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
