> On 22 May 2016, at 17:44, Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Meer, Hans van der 22. Mai 2016 um 17:40
>>
>> It is not clear as yet.
>> \starttext
>> \input knuth
>> \page[header,yes]
>> \input knuth
>> \page[header,yes]
>> \input knuth
>> \stoptext
>> Here I get three pages, the first two without the last with header. That I
>> understand.
>>
>> \starttext
>> \input knuth
>> \page[header]
>> \page
>> \input knuth
>> \stoptext
>> Both pages keep their header.
>>
>> \starttext
>> \input knuth
>> \page
>> \page[header]
>> \input knuth
>> \stoptext
>> Both pages keep their header.
>>
>> Should I conclude that the state change occurs if and onlyif when in the
>> same macrocall a real pagebreak is realize?
>> Because otherwise I do not observe a state change.
> Change the order of the keywords (yes before header).
>
> The header and footer keywords can be used when you want to hide header and
> footer texts
> on empty left pages before a chapter etc. in a doublesided document.
That is clear to me. But my question was: why do neither \page\page[header] nor
\page[header]\page make any difference unless in these cases \page[haeder] is
effectively a noop.
>
> \setuppagenumbering[alternative=doublesided]
> \setuphead[chapter][page={yes,header,right}]
> \starttext
> \chapter{First chapter}
> \chapter{Second chapter}
> \stoptext
>
> Wolfgang
Hans van der Meer
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
