Dear list,
I have two questions about the following sample:
\startbuffer[demo]
<doc>Two links: <a>Document 1</a>, <em><a>Document 2</a></em>.
And <em><em>different</em></em> results.</doc>
\stopbuffer
\startxmlsetups xml:initialize
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{*}{-}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{doc|em}{xml:*}
%~ \xmlsetsetup{#1}{(a|em/a)}{xml:linked}
%~ \xmlsetsetup{#1}{(a or em/a)}{xml:linked}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{a}{xml:linked}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{em/a}{xml:linked}
\stopxmlsetups
\xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize}
\startxmlsetups xml:doc
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:em
\bgroup\em\xmlflush{#1}\egroup
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:linked
\bgroup\em\xmlflush{#1}\egroup
\stopxmlsetups
\starttext
\xmlprocessbuffer{main}{demo}{}
\stoptext
The first issue is why doesn’t the lpaths with "or" and "|" don’t work.
Or at least, they give a different result from defining each lpath
separately.
The second issue is why the lpath em/a gets double emphasis. Since I
seem to be missing something, which is the way to avoid that the em/a
lpath doesn’t get the em lpath applied? (I mean, that "Document 2" only
gets an emphasis.)
Many thanks for your help,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
