Sorry, I forgot the second attachment.
On 26/07/2017 22:01, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/26/2017 09:25 PM, Sebastian L. wrote:
[..]
... I initially didn't plan on using roman numbers. But right now
this seems the only proper solution to the wrong numbering in my
case. I attached an explanation document to show you what I mean.
If you still wish for the source files please tell me.
Hi Sebastian,
using Roman numerals is a way to workaround the issue.
Unless you provide a minimal source that replicates the wrong numbering,
it would be hard to guess which causes the issue on your document (I’m
afraid I’m not that smart :-().
In the PDF document, you mention makeups. See the difference in numbering:
\setuppapersize[A9]
\starttext
\dorecurse{5}{\startmakeup[standard]\recurselevel\stopmakeup}
\setupmakeup[standard][pagestate=start]
\dorecurse{5}{\startmakeup[standard]\recurselevel\stopmakeup}
\stoptext
But we’re still guessing.
Pablo
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
