Am 2018-06-25 um 14:15 schrieb Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl>:
> On 6/24/2018 10:07 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>> Am 2018-06-24 um 21:57 schrieb Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl>:
>>> as there is no index entry blah, humbug or bug ... so you would be fooling
>>> your reader
>> I understand the rationale, and it could be a nice feature, but we need to
>> refer to entries in a different register, e.g. from an index of topics to an
>> index of persons, e.g. \seeindex{Pragma}{Hagen, Hans} or to subentries like
>> \seeindex{fun+games}{bah+humbug}. Since the latter doesn’t work (or does it
>> now?), we use \seeindex{fun+games}{bah/humbug}.
> hm, sounds like a crappy index to mee (i actually hate these indexes that
> force you to 'see' somplace else .. extra lookup)
I hear you, but it wouldn’t make sense to double-index a lot of terms (it might
increase usability, but also double the length of the index).
> anyway, i'll add check=no to placeregister so that one can bypass the check
> (but i cannot foresee side effects like missing references in interactiev
> documents so these have to be taken for granted)
Thank you, that fits my/our needs, I guess.
Greetlings, Hraban
---
https://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
