On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
The same thing happens after the itemization as in the following MWE.
\defineenumeration[proof][text=Proof.]
\setupenumeration[proof]
[number=no,
closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
\starttext
\startproof
This is a simple proof.
\stopproof
\startproof
This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
\startformula
1+1=2.
\stopformula
\stopproof
\startproof
\startitemize[n]
\item first line.
\item second line
Add: \placeclosesymbol here
\stopitemize
\stopproof
\stoptext
For display equations, there is not easy solution. (What should happen if
there is an equation number; what should happen if the display equation
overflows hsize, etc.). The latex package `ntheorem` implements a two pass
solution (measures where the equation number box gets placed, and then add
the close symbol below it). I am not sure how easy it is to implement such
an approach in ConTeXt.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
