On 28/10/2018 16:06, Joseph Wright wrote:
Hello all,
Looking at management of global Lua tables (for the obvious cases ...),
I notice that all of the core Mk IV files use the construct
if not modules then modules = { } end
modules["<file-name"] = { -- meta-data here
From a ConTeXt point-of-view, is it acceptable for third-parties to use
this construct, or is it 'ConTeXt maintainers only'? I'm wondering for
code used generically: it would be good to use the same approach, but I
don't want to tread on any reserved namespaces.
Joseph
Somehow I've managed to loose Hans' reply, but I've seen it in the
archive :)
Hans: Thanks for the quick reply. I'll suggest to the LaTeX team that we
treat table modules as ConTeXt-specific/reserved, and will think of a
different name.
Joseph
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
