On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:22 AM luigi scarso <luigi.sca...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:18 AM Ulrike Fischer <ne...@nililand.de> wrote:
>
>> According to the xelatex output in the following example both
>> variants are not correct. What would be needed would be the first
>> two glyphs from variant 1 (knd2 script) and the third from variant 2
>> (knda script).
>>
>>
> dunno, but to start with at  least I visually see what's going on:
>
> \showotfcomposition{file:notosanskannada-regular.ttf*kannada-testA at
> 48pt}{-1}{ಕ್ರ}
>
>
> \showotfcomposition{file:notosanskannada-regular.ttf*kannada-testB at
> 48pt}{-1}{ಕ್ರ}
>
> support for knd2 is still in progress,
and  in knda
glyph ಕ (U+00C95) +  glyph ್ (U+00CCD) + glyph ರ (U+00CB0)
also is not ok ( at least for what I understand until now).
I see where it fails ( and where hb does it right), let's see if I am able
to find a patch.


-- 
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to