Hi, I don't use ConTeXt anymore, but I still get the emails from the list, and I quickly skimmed throught this thread to see if someone writes about my pdf-viewer of choice - pdf-tools (https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools).
On 2019-10-13, at 12:43, Henning Hraban Ramm <te...@fiee.net> wrote: > Hi, I’d like to update my list of (usable!) PDF viewers. > Which one do you use? (Current version?) pdf-tools (version 20190701.202) > What are its pros and cons? cons: - no "continuous display"/"double page" modes pros: - searchable (also with regexen), also grep-like (i.e., display all lines containing some regex and jump to them easily) - annotations/comments are viewable (and jumpable to) w/o using the mouse - fast - runs within Emacs (not sure if this is a "pro" for everyone...) > Is it free (open source, freeware)? yes (GPL3) > Does it work on Win/Lin/Mac? GNU/Linux, maybe Mac > Does it have a localized interface? (I don’t care, but I work with > people who don’t understand a lot of English.) No. > Can it handle comments, attachments? Yes. > Can it handle forms with or without JavaScript? AFAIK, no. > Does it support SyncTeX? (Who uses that anyway?) Yes, and I do all the time! > Does it update changed PDFs on its own (or does it even block > overwriting)? I guess it can be configured to do so (like Emacs in general) > Which other features are essential for your choice? As I said - I don't have to leave Emacs. Also, incremental or grep-like searching with literal text or regexen are killer features. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
