On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Wolfgang Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: > > Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq > questions comes to me: > > Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as in TeX/LaTeX? Or has > something changed in latin modern? See the attached pdf files > (derivatives.pdf from ConTeXt and primetime-crop.pdf from lualatex). The > prime character looks more slanted in ConTeXt. It also almost looks like it > is cut horizontally at the bottom of the character. Also, the space between > the two x in the subscript looks a bit large to me. Is that easily tuned? > > > ConTeXt uses the OpenType version of the Latin Modern math font > while your LaTeX file uses the older Type1 version of the font > which uses multiple files for the different sizes. You can see this > when look into the document information which can be done > with your PDF viewer (or a command line tool like pdffonts). > > Wolfgang > > Thanks! That was sloppy of me not to check in the pdf before sending. I attach the correct file generated by lualatex for others. Indeed, the primes are "cut off" horizontally, but perhaps that is a choice of design. The question regarding spaces in the subscript remains. /Mikael
primetime-crop-otf.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
