Rudd, Kevin schrieb am 09.09.2020 um 00:30:
Thanks. The immediate goal is to make a ”quad chart” w/ different
pains in the four (2x2 => NW, NE, SW, SE) quadrants. It seemed that
the concept was scalable to any NxM (even with multi-cell
spreads---useful for larger structured posters) based on TABLE. But
I'd settle for 2x2 at the moment; at one point I'd thought of 2x2+1
having a spanning block for publication references per slide but
decided a separate publications slide was a better idea visualy..
If they have to see an end command, would before/after tags work
around a framedtext or buffer structure?
1. 2x2 panes, layout order not important, all panes independent; no
flow (like Framemaker used to do) requiredbetween panes.
2. was going to have inner frames (i.e. + frame for 2x2 which was
trivial to specify in TABLE) to separate the panes
3. other than wanting the + frame, inner margins &c. for panes wsn't
an issue either way.
When you need one than single block per line this definition
\define\startPaneRow{bTR\bTD}
\define\stopPaneRow{\eTD\eTR}
doesn't make sense because you limit yourself and after each table cell
there is a new row.
While you can write code which moves your blocks around you should ask
yourself the question is it worth it. When you have only two or three
posters in this format use the extra commands for table rows and cells
because it takes more time to write something which does the work.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
