On 8/17/2021 4:47 PM, Taco Hoekwater via ntg-context wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 17 Aug 2021, at 16:39, Hans van der Meer via ntg-context
<ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
I am still interested in this luacondition 733 allthough the culprit has been
spotted. Very nasty typo and hard to spot fo me.
The “luacondition 733” is the \ifxmlatt . You get these numbers because the
command is
defined using lua ‘interfaces.implement’ (lxml-ini.lua) instead of directly as
a TeX conditional.
And yes indeed, the new lua-defined commands are hard to derive from the log
information
(for the other Hans: is this reporting not controlled via ‘public=true’ ? ).
no, that's just namespacing, but we have a trick that can be used to
resolve it and I simply hadn't that one plugged into the conditions
stuff (only in functions) ... so i did that and next time HvdM will see:
(\end occurred when luacondition \ifxmlatt on line 13 was incomplete)
although of course he will never make that mistake again so he will not
notice this new feature
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
