Ludovico, I have removed the BSD clause. As far as I remember it's old stuff I have removed.
Regards Luca On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Ludovico Cavedon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi again, > > as it is right now, protocol.c cannot be redistibute, as it contains 2 > conflicting licenses: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Ludovico Cavedon <[email protected]> wrote: >> another licensing issues has been reported [1] in the ntop source code. >> >> The protocols.c contains both the GPL and the 4-clause BSD license. >> However, the 4-clause BSD license is not compatible with the GPL >> because of its "advertising clause" [2]. >> >> I tried to understand what part of the code is licensed under BSD, but >> I could not find it. Can you give me some details on that? >> >> That part can be replaced, or, if it comes from the BSD distribution, >> it will benefit from this re-licensing [3]. > > I spent some time trying to find what code might be coming from BSD, > however I could not find parts of the code in protocols.c anywhere > else on it. It looks to me that everything in protocols.c is > ntop-style code, which makes me think the BSD header in that file is > some leftover and no longer applies. > > However I need an official answer confirming or denying this, please. > > Thanks, > Ludovico > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
