Ok, I moved my supernode onto my home lan, forwarded the necessary ports,
and got it to work.

I was running my supernode @ vpsland and the only thing I can think of is
either they compress traffic or somehow interfere with udp traffic. I'm not
sure. Either way, I can ping and RDP my tablet PC that is connected to the
'net via a sprint data card.

Nice!

C

On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Chris Norman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, I'll keep trying without HTTP tunneling.
>
> I can't get my edge's to register without it unless they're on my local LAN
> (which sort of defeats the purpose) :).
>
> I downloaded the VPN clients from vpnhosting.cz and tested that. I
> couldn't get that to work on their supernode either.
>
> They do, however, have an edge build with no compression.
> If anyone has a trunk source that they *know* works plz zip and email. I'll
> compare the file to see if there's anything diff.
>
> I built it using VS2008 on Vista 64 biz.  I'll try building on 32bit, but I
> seriously doubt it'll make a difference.
>
> Thanks!
> C
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Richard Andrews 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The error is (lzoconf.h).
>>
>> #define LZO_E_INPUT_OVERRUN         (-4)
>>
>> I've never seen it before. I gues something did not build properly.
>>
>> n2n folks - does anyone out there have a working Windows binary set
>> they can provide to Chris to get him going.
>>
>> Remove http tunnelling (-t). HTTP tunnelling was experimental and
>> never worked properly AFAIK.
>>
>> Can you try the getting started example from the wiki as closely as
>> possible.
>>
>> --
>>  Rich
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Chris Norman<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Ok, I've compiled the trunk and I can run my supernode and edge will
>> connect
>> > (but only in -t mode).
>> >
>> > When I connect another edge, the first node dies with this error:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > C:\n2n2>edge -a 10.1.2.2 -c mynetwork -k encryptme -l xx.yy.zz.aa:8080
>> -t
>> > 10.1.2.2
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:39:55 [     edge.c:1133] Using supernode xx.yy.zz.aa:8080
>> > Open device
>> > [name={36EFA202-1526-4E75-9168-356E08EB9ACA}][ip=10.1.2.2][ifName=Lo
>> > cal Area Connection 2][MTU=1400][mac=00:FF:36:EF:A2:02]
>> > Setting Local Area Connection 2 device address...
>> > Ok.
>> >
>> > Device Local Area Connection 2 set to 10.1.2.2/255.255.255.0
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:01 [     edge.c: 670] Registering with supernode
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:01 [     edge.c:1364]
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:01 [     edge.c:1365] Ready
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:02 [     edge.c:1032] Received REGISTER_ACK from
>> remote
>> > peer [
>> > ip=0.0.0.0:0]
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:02 [     edge.c:1431] STATUS: pending=0, operational=0
>> > 11/Jul/2009 17:40:02 [      n2n.c: 503] WARNING: Failed to decompress
>> 221
>> > byte p
>> > acket. LZO error=-4
>> >
>> > C:\n2n2>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Strange ...
>> >
>> > After this, the edge nodes struggle to connect.
>> >
>> > I see the nodes register on the server.
>> >
>> > Does the fact I'm running them both from one network (and therefore
>> natted
>> > from the same IP) make a difference?
>> >
>> > I connected my other computer to an open wireless network, and had
>> similar
>> > results.
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance for any assistance,
>> > C
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> From http://highscalability.com/google-architecture:
> A 1,000-fold computer power increase can be had for a 33 times lower cost
> if you you use a failure-prone infrastructure rather than an infrastructure
> built on highly reliable components. You must build reliability on top of
> unreliability for this strategy to work."
>



-- 
>From http://highscalability.com/google-architecture:
A 1,000-fold computer power increase can be had for a 33 times lower cost if
you you use a failure-prone infrastructure rather than an infrastructure
built on highly reliable components. You must build reliability on top of
unreliability for this strategy to work."
_______________________________________________
Ntop-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

Reply via email to