Daniel
it looks your traffic is not easy balance-able then. What kind of packets are 
you using?

Luca

On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Daniel Aschwanden wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> Hi Luca,
> 
> On 04/19/2011 05:33 PM, Luca Deri wrote:
>> Daniel
>> if you have 100k concurrent flows, -w 256000 will do the job
>> 
>> Luca
> 
> Unfortunately not (-w 262144):
> 
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1459] ---------------------------------
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1460] Average traffic: [105.431 K pps][68
> Mb/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1465] Current traffic: [142.662 K pps][88
> Mb/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1471] Current flow export rate: [12653.5
> flows/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1474] Flow drops: [export queue too
> long=0][too many flows=0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1480] Flow Buckets:
> [active=532231][allocated=532231][toBeExported=0][frags=0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1516] Processed packets: 10332302 (max
> bucket search: 14)
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:1519] Flow Collection: [collected pkts:
> 0][processed flows: 0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:39 [nprobe.c:222] Packet stats: 10332424/0 pkts
> rcvd/dropped [0.0%] [Last 285324/0 pkts rcvd/dropped]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1459] ---------------------------------
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1460] Average traffic: [105.521 K pps][68
> Mb/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1465] Current traffic: [108.445 K pps][67
> Mb/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1471] Current flow export rate: [29935.3
> flows/sec]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1474] Flow drops: [export queue too
> long=0][too many flows=0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1480] Flow Buckets:
> [active=605659][allocated=606136][toBeExported=477][frags=0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1516] Processed packets: 10657626 (max
> bucket search: 16)
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:1519] Flow Collection: [collected pkts:
> 0][processed flows: 0]
> 19/Apr/2011 17:40:42 [nprobe.c:222] Packet stats: 10657745/0 pkts
> rcvd/dropped [0.0%] [Last 325321/0 pkts rcvd/dropped]
> 
> I know in theory the probability of occurance of list size > 16 should
> be quite small.
> 
> I'm even more confused about that a obviously too big hash (2^23)
> doesn't decrease the list size.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> Cheers, Dani
> 
> - -- 
> daniel aschwanden
> junior engineer
> 
> open systems ag
> raeffelstrasse 29
> ch-8045 zurich
> t: +41 44 455 74 00
> f: +41 44 455 74 01
> [email protected]
> 
> http://www.open.ch
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iF4EAREIAAYFAk2tsBMACgkQxIzmH53Qg6HBtgD+Jxvl+v+YGAuwFgnq0b9fmsjR
> Ve9Pa7yiAlaRO568asABAJTRmorB8vIggS/VqZ/JfUs255AZdMOHKmWEQDd9txPA
> =rX7B
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

---
If you can not measure it, you can not improve it - Lord Kelvin

_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to