Scott actually we recommend kernels > 2.6.18 with vanilla PF_RING, not with DNA. However 2.6.31 should be fine. Upgrading to a newer version is not a bad idea, if possible. Currently we are mainly using 2.6.36 and newer kernels. A asked you about 32/64bit just because there was an old 32bit dna library in svn.
Regards Alfredo On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Scott L wrote: > Alfredo, > > I noticed that our machine is running an older kernel (2.6.31.5-127). > The PF_RING webpage states that it works with kernels 2.6.18 and newer > so I hadn't given it much thought. But given our strange problem, I'm > wondering if you have had success with kernels of a similar vintage? > Should we upgrade to a newer version? > > Also, given your question about a 32-bit or 64-bit kernel, have you > noticed that one or the other works better with PF_RING? > > =s= > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Scott L <[email protected]> wrote: >> Alfredo, >> >> We're currently running a 64-bit kernel. Also, our system is >> AMD-based (dual-socket quad-core Opterons). >> >> =s= >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Alfredo Cardigliano >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Scott >>> just one more question, is your system 32 or 64 bit based? >>> As I told you, this is a strange issue and I need to reproduce/debug >>> it in order to identify the cause. >>> >>> Alfredo >>> > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
