Hello
On 05/22/2013 09:50 AM, frwa onto wrote:
> Hi Vito,
>           Let me first thank you a lot you have been helping me a lot
> since these few days and appreciate it.

np, you're welcome

> 1.
>  Ok I was then compiling it the wrong way. Why it need to be so
> complicated ? Isnt the libraries should be linked automatically. 

yes but you have to setup the write include/lib path because the pfring
aware ones overlap the one that came with the OS...

>So
> what I did I tried the first command as below and I just chance the
> output to pfcount11. Since this already giving error I could not run the
> second command and still confuse why need these 2 command. Ok let me
> tell you what I plan is to purely use pf_ring to capture packets at wire
> speed as it suppose to do. So for that how should I work around with out
> the legacy pcap ?
> 
> gcc  -O2 -DHAVE_PF_RING  -Wall -I../../kernel -I../../kernel/plugins
> -I../lib I../libpcap-1.1.1-ring  -D HAVE_ZERO -D ENABLE_BPF -O2  -c
> pfcount.c -o pfcount11.o


missing the minus?

I../libpcap-1.1.1-ring --> -I../libpcap-1.1.1-ring

let me know if it helps

ciao
-v
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to