Robert this is an interesting project: I like it. I believe that users should decide what to do, so this is the idea of the new version where you have this option contrary to DNA where such option is not available
Regards Luca On 10 Nov 2013, at 11:23, Robert Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, I want PF_RING DNA to *NOT* support the stack. The sorts of things > I'm doing with PF_RING are security related, that a PF_RING adapter cannot be > hooked up to the Linux network stack is a good feature. > > For example, my latest PF_RING supporting project is "isowall": > https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/isowall > > If the network adapter on the hostile side of the firewall is "dna0", then I > can be guaranteed that the Linux network stack isn't ever going to be > accidentally connected to the adapter. The user would have to go through lot > of effort to uninstall the DNA driver before they can make other mistakes. > > So I'm hoping you don't add the featur :) > > > -------------------------------------------- > On Sun, 11/10/13, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] ifconfig dna0 10.2.3.4 > To: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, November 10, 2013, 1:28 AM > > Robert > not on the current version. but on the next one we are > developing. > > Luca > > On 10 Nov 2013, at 07:51, Robert Graham <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Can PF_RING DNA be used for normal TCP/IP networking? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc _______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
