Hi Any help would be appreciated.
Best regards, Katarina Valent From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Katarina Valent Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 1:14 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Alan Klikić Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING ZC and jnetpcap Hi Alfredo Thank you for your answer. After loading driver with single queue, issues in Q2 and Q3 have been resolved. Thank you! What remains is Q4: Question 4: Tshark is now linked to PF_RING aware libpcap: root@liproxy:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu# ldd /usr/bin/tshark | grep libpcap libpcap.so.0.8 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.0.8 (0x00007f5b296ce000) root@liproxy:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu# ls -lh | grep libpca lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Dec 8 10:37 libpcap.so.0.8 -> libpcap.so.1.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 596K Dec 8 09:24 libpcap.so.1.1.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 232K Jun 13 2012 libpcap.so.1.3.0 When starting tshark dump we can see new line "Capturing on PF_RING", and a new file in /proc/net/pf_ring. Current problem we are having is that if we start tshark with "-i eth2", we can see packets, but starting it with "-i zc:eth2" results in no packets. Is this connected to question number 2 and 3? Are all packets dropped for some reason and this is reason tshark doesn't see them? >> Even after changing to single queue, tshark doesn't see packet if started >> with zc:eth2. Addition: Question 5 Drops when using pcount with zc:eht2. This test was done after changing to single queue. Pcount result when using "-i eth2": root@liproxy:/opt/PF_RING-6.0.2/userland/examples#<mailto:root@liproxy:/opt/PF_RING-6.0.2/userland/examples> ./pcount -i eth2 Capturing from eth5 ========================= Absolute Stats: [902633 pkts rcvd][0 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=902633/Dropped=0.0 % 902633 pkts [905652.4 pkt/sec] - 768257468 bytes [6166.62 Mbit/sec] ========================= ========================= Absolute Stats: [1653917 pkts rcvd][0 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=1653917/Dropped=0.0 % 1653917 pkts [828302.8 pkt/sec] - 1406209160 bytes [5633.98 Mbit/sec] ========================= Actual Stats: 1'653'917 pkts [1000.1 ms][1'653'771.50 pkt/sec] ========================= ========================= Absolute Stats: [2402999 pkts rcvd][0 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=2402999/Dropped=0.0 % 2402999 pkts [801831.1 pkt/sec] - 2049090798 bytes [5469.91 Mbit/sec] ========================= Actual Stats: 749'082 pkts [1000.1 ms][748'980.92 pkt/sec] ========================= Result when using "-i zc:eth2": root@liproxy:/opt/PF_RING-6.0.2/userland/examples#<mailto:root@liproxy:/opt/PF_RING-6.0.2/userland/examples> ./pcount -i zc:eth2 ========================= Absolute Stats: [729018 pkts rcvd][161067 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=567951/Dropped=22.1 % 729018 pkts [1165250.5 pkt/sec] - 606789379 bytes [7759.06 Mbit/sec] ========================= ========================= Absolute Stats: [1853747 pkts rcvd][161067 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=1692680/Dropped=8.7 % 1853747 pkts [1140181.5 pkt/sec] - 1546317882 bytes [7608.73 Mbit/sec] ========================= Actual Stats: 1'853'747 pkts [1000.2 ms][1'853'370.74 pkt/sec] ========================= ========================= Absolute Stats: [2963170 pkts rcvd][161067 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=2802103/Dropped=5.4 % 2963170 pkts [1128395.9 pkt/sec] - 2472909764 bytes [7533.61 Mbit/sec] ========================= Actual Stats: 1'109'423 pkts [1000.2 ms][1'109'237.74 pkt/sec] ========================= ========================= Absolute Stats: [4046292 pkts rcvd][161067 pkts dropped] Total Pkts=3885225/Dropped=4.0 % 4046291 pkts [1115861.7 pkt/sec] - 3374447819 bytes [7444.68 Mbit/sec] ========================= Can you please answer Q4 and Q5 as soon as possible? Thank you, Katarina Valent From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alfredo Cardigliano Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:48 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Alan Klikić Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] PF_RING ZC and jnetpcap Hi Katarina Q1: yes, if you use latest code from SVN you will see “ZC” Q2-4: please make sure the driver is loaded with a single queue (RSS=1,1,1,1), probably you have multiple queues and capturing from the first only (zc:eth2 == zc:eth2@0) Alfredo
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
