Hmmm.... I understand. Thank you!

But can I disconnect interface from system completely with ixgbe/pf_ring flags?

I do some testing and my tool running not all time. In time while tool
switched off I got bunch of packets and my system overloaded :(

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano
<cardigli...@ntop.org> wrote:
> Hi Pavel
> when you open an interface in ZC mode (zc:ethX) it gets disconnected from the 
> linux stack
>
> Alfredo
>
>> On 12 Dec 2014, at 18:42, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> But how I can disable passing packets to system? I need this packets
>> only at PF_RING level :)
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Luca Deri <d...@ntop.org> wrote:
>>> Good to know ZC works as expected
>>>
>>> Luca
>>>
>>>> On 12 Dec 2014, at 17:33, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yep, I opened zc:ethX and everything works fine. But ksoftirqd still
>>>> overload my system because packets flow into Linux Network Stack too
>>>> :(
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Luca Deri <d...@ntop.org> wrote:
>>>>> ok but for using zc you need to open “zc:eth4” whereas “eth4” uses sthe
>>>>> standard PF_RING
>>>>>
>>>>> Luca
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Dec 2014, at 17:23, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it will be relevant and I have 2 NIC's with 2 ports each in this
>>>>> server:
>>>>>
>>>>> 0a:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit
>>>>> SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
>>>>> 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit
>>>>> SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
>>>>> 0d:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit
>>>>> SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
>>>>> 0d:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit
>>>>> SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>> <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, very strange!
>>>>>
>>>>> In transparent_mode=2 quick_mode=1 I still can see packets at
>>>>> interface with standard pcap tcpdump:
>>>>> tcpdump -i eth4 -c 10
>>>>> tcpdump: WARNING: eth4: no IPv4 address assigned
>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
>>>>> listening on eth4, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
>>>>> 19:15:19.916730 IP 10.10.10.100.49645 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916733 IP 10.10.10.100.41742 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916734 IP 10.10.10.100.30047 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916735 IP 10.10.10.100.41743 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916736 IP 10.10.10.100.38649 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916737 IP 10.10.10.100.30048 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916739 IP 10.10.10.100.49646 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916740 IP 10.10.10.100.52632 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916741 IP 10.10.10.100.41744 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 19:15:19.916742 IP 10.10.10.100.30049 > 10.10.10.200.0: UDP, length 0
>>>>> 10 packets captured
>>>>> 2980 packets received by filter
>>>>> 2839 packets dropped by kernel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>> <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello, Luca!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm loading ixgbe patched ixgbe driver, loaded pf_ring, start hping
>>>>> flood from another machine and got 90% of kernel load from ksoftirqd.
>>>>> I did not started any toolkit yet :(
>>>>>
>>>>> But ZC looks like working because it work many times faster then
>>>>> vanilla PF_RING and process 2 mpps of packets! And it complains about
>>>>> license:
>>>>>
>>>>> # ERROR: You do not seem to have a valid PF_RING ZC license
>>>>> 6.0.2.140923 for eth4 [Intel 10 Gbit ixgbe 82599-based]
>>>>> # ERROR: Please get one at http://shop.ntop.org/.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Luca Deri <d...@ntop.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Pavel
>>>>> if you have ksoftirq up, I believe you are not using ZC. Please explain 
>>>>> what
>>>>> you are doing?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Luca
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Dec 2014, at 16:24, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Total number of generated packets per second flood was about 1million
>>>>> packets per second, CPU E5-2407 0 @ 2.20GHz.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>> <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using PF_RING 6.0.2 with Debian 7 Wheezy 3.2.0-4-amd64. I
>>>>> installed ixgbe driver with ZC support and loaded it with
>>>>> load_driver.sh.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't need any processing and linux stack thus I set: 
>>>>> transparent_mode=2.
>>>>>
>>>>> After this I run udp flood from 6 hping instances from another server:
>>>>> hping3 -I eth1 --udp --flood 10.10.10.200
>>>>>
>>>>> After this I run top and got this:
>>>>> %Cpu(s):  0.0 us,  0.0 sy,  0.0 ni, 90.3 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  9.7 si,  
>>>>> 0.0
>>>>> st
>>>>> 3 root      20   0     0    0    0 S  78.5  0.0   5:40.02
>>>>> ksoftirqd/0
>>>>> htop looks like this:
>>>>> 1  [||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||93.9%]
>>>>> Tasks: 24, 3 thr, 49 kthr; 1 running
>>>>> 2  [
>>>>> 0.0%]     Load average: 0.05 0.20 0.22
>>>>> 3  [
>>>>> 0.0%]     Uptime: 18 days, 22:04:44
>>>>> 4  [                                                             0.0%]
>>>>> Mem[|||||||||||||||                                      2661/32207MB]
>>>>> Swp[                                                         0/8190MB]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I even tried to enable quick_mode=1 but ksoftirqd consuming almost
>>>>> whole CPU core.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your attention!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc



-- 
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to