Hello!

Wow! Roadmaps for 2015 is really awesome!
http://www.ntop.org/announce/ntop-2015-roadmap/


On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Morgan
> in the current ZC implementation you do not have to change anything in the
> guest or patch QEMU, but just load a kernel module (see
> https://svn.ntop.org/svn/ntop/trunk/PF_RING/userland/examples_zc/README.kvm).
>
> The us-vhost approach is interesting and we might consider supporting it.
> But not in a month or two, as we’re actively working at other projects (see
> our blog) that we will start introducing this spring.
>
> Regards Luca
>
>
> the enhancement
>
> On 11 Mar 2015, at 06:32, Morgan Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> Recently the Intel DPDK guys presented about a "us-vhost" approach, which
> they added DPDK support to KVM's side of vhost. See presentation here
> http://openvswitch.org/support/ovscon2014/18/1530-dpdk-accelerating.pptx
>
> The nice thing about this is approach is least intrusive to the guest. For
> "black box" or bundled virtual appliance deployments, we don't have the
> ability to change the guest's virtio module, so we don't be able to
> integrate with PF_RING_ZC and Netmap VALE.
>
> I'm curious if PF_RING is planning on something similar.
>
>
> Much Thanks
> Morgan Yang
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc



-- 
Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to