Different machines have different drivers
t1.micro: driver: vif
m4.xlarge: driver: ixgbevf
I just wonder if there is a way to run ZC there.
What is the performance difference between pf_ring and pf_ring ZC ?
Thanks,
Pedro
/On 05 Aug 2015, at 15:13, pmneveshi5 <pmneveshi5 at gmail.com
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>> wrote: />//>/Hello all,
/>//>/I have a few basic question: />//>/- does pf_ring zc works on amazon ec2 ? /
Sorry, I never ran pf_ring zc on top of ec2, please run some test.
/- Alfredo said : />/" for testing the API you do not need DNA/ZC drivers, you can use />/the ZC API (sample apps, balancing, etc.) with standard drivers />/(opening the device without the “zc:” prefix)" />//>/http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/private/ntop-misc/2015-February/004860.html
<http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/private/ntop-misc/2015-February/004860.html>
/>//>/Does it mean that for testing the API is exactly the same ZC or "non
ZC/standard” ? /
Yes, the ZC API supports both ZC-mode drivers and standard drivers (just open
the interface without the “zc:” prefix).
/- does pf_ring ZC supports virtio drivers (virtualbox, kvm) ? />/instead of
doing (PCI-passthrough) /
Virtio drivers are supported in standard mode (use standard drivers, without
the “zc:” prefix)
Best Regards
Alfredo
//
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
