Unless I am misunderstanding you, that is exactly what I am doing.  Correct
me if I am wrong.

I am using the 'pfring_zc_run_balancer' to load balance packets across
multiple worker threads.  It is the master (aka balancer) thread that is my
bottleneck.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Luca Deri <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nick,
> if you want to scale you need to enable RSS (or use the zbalancer) and
> have a thread per queue.
>
> Luca
>
> On 03 Sep 2015, at 18:24, Nick Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have a similar need.  I need to ingest 40+ gpbs into a Hadoop grid.
> Kafka is acting as my landing zone/front door for the grid.
>
> I tried many variations of using tcpdump, Flume, and other concoctions.  I
> ended up building a custom pcap ingest process in C.  The app uses PF_RING
> ZC to load balance packets across multiple threads.  I then push the packet
> data into Kafka using librdkafka.  Both the pull from PF_RING and the push
> to Kafka batch many packets at a time (trading latency for throughput).
>
> With the minimal tuning that I have done, it can handle roughly 10-12
> Gbps.  I only need to achieve 10 Gbps on a single host and then I am going
> to scale horizontally to manage the aggregate pcap that I need to capture.
>
> Right now, the bottleneck is the master thread in PF_RING that dispatches
> packets off to each worker thread.  That thread pegs a single CPU core (a
> rather beefy core, I might add).  It does not seem capable of handling
> additional worker threads to scale beyond 10-12 Gbps.
>
> I wish I had access to the source to review and confirm, but that is how
> it appears with the information that I have.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Manny Veloso <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Also, when you say 1k flows per second is that 1k devices reporting their
>> flows every second? We’d need a two to three orders of magnitude more
>> performance.
>> --
>> Manny Veloso
>> Sr. Solutions Engineer
>> Smartrg.com
>>
>> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Luca Deri <
>> [email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <
>> [email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 10:52 PM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [Ntop-misc] nprobe and kafka?
>>
>> Manny
>> we have added kafka support on one of our development prototypes so
>> movign to the official nprobe should not be too difficult. The performance
>> is similar to the ZMQ or elasticsearch implementation, so considered the
>> JSON conversion is at least 1k flows/sec
>>
>> Luca
>>
>> On 01 Sep 2015, at 23:20, Manny Veloso <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I’m looking to use nprobe as a bridge into kafka. In the splunk app
>> nprobe just sends data into splunk. Is that basically the same
>> configuration as a kafka install?
>>
>> Also, what kind of throughput can I expect out of nprobe?
>> --
>> Manny Veloso
>> Sr. Solutions Engineer
>> Smartrg.com <http://smartrg.com/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nick Allen <[email protected]>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>



-- 
Nick Allen <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to