Hi Bryan using standard drivers you can leverage on the pf_ring features but you do not get significant performance improvements.
Best Regards Alfredo > On 24 Sep 2015, at 17:04, bryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi experts > > My computer has 1 intel nic with e1000e driver on it. If my linux computer > could not test the Zero-copy (does not have two NICs), and DMA (below min. > linux kernel requirement), what other pf_ring option can achieve better > performance than standard linux network programming like epoll? > > What is vanilla pf_ring mention in this link > http://www.ntop.org/products/packet-capture/pf_ring/ > <http://www.ntop.org/products/packet-capture/pf_ring/> ? Does it mean no > driver require to load after insmod pf_ring.ko? How does it achieve faster > performance than linux methods like epoll with pooled pre-allocated memory? > > Best Regards > Bryan > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-misc mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc > <http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Ntop-misc mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
