LOL - then WTF would 600 "microflows" / second be? 600 / 1M or .0006 Flows / second? If so I'm pretty sure that could be rounded down to zero! :)
Some graphs seem to be OK and make sense, while others.... not even close to what I *think* is going on on my net, and which other nTop stats agree with. Anyway, just wondering if others have noticed this. It *may* be more applicable to those running netflow as I don't *think* ntop counts "conversations" as "flows" when using libpcap. Just a guess though, maybe it does? G -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 6:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ntop] RRD graph labels / units incorrect? Just saw reference to this (or what looks to be this) on a different list: It seems to stand for micro, not million. Kurt On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 16:17, Gary Gatten <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > > > Is it just me or are many/most of the X axis labels (more specifically the > units) on the RRD graphs incorrect? I'm pretty sure I don't have 600 > Million Telnet flows per second. I'm not even sure I have 600, so I have no > clue what to make of this. Other labels (for instance) say "Flows", when I > *think* it should be "Flows/s" - but could be "Flows/m"? > > > > Anyway - if anyone else has noticed this please let me know. I'll try to > hack around the code a little and see what's up. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Gary > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
