Thanks for your help Gary. Have a great week. Tony
On Sep 7, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Gary Gatten wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with how long it was down - purely on > data collected and some standard deviation calcs. Yes, you'll find more info > than you care to in the rrd docs and/or by googling rrd upper lower > deviation, etc. As noted it's a feature of rrd, so ntop devs rely on the rrd > docs vs. duplicating their efforts. Perhaps a footnote or embedded link to > the rrd info on this feature would be a good idea! > > G > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Nelson > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ntop] Upper Value on Network Load Graphs > > I've used ntop, exactly as I've had it in the past.. > > Is this possibly because I had the ntop server shut down for quite a long > time and just started it back up? > > I'd be happy to google it if I knew what exactly I was looking for... I did > spend about a half an hour reading through ntop docs.. I'll google RRD stuff > now too. > > Thanks > Tony > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Gary Gatten wrote: > >> Google this. It's a standard deviation thing - check rrd docs for more >> info, it's not specific to ntop. >> >> G >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Nelson >> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3:25 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Ntop] Upper Value on Network Load Graphs >> >> Hi All, >> >> I recently started monitoring part of my network again and I'm seeing a >> graph I can't explain. Basically the "upper" line is significantly higher >> than any throughput I'm seeing. >> >> I think I may have a node on my network that is misbehaving, but I'm not >> sure how to figure out what to look at next. >> >> The graphs that I'm seeing can be found here: >> >> http://borneo.starpoint.com/~tnelson/ntop.html >> >> When I look at the Network Load Statistics Matrix, the Average Throughput of >> the top nodes doesn't come close to matching the "upper" bandwidth. >> >> Can anyone suggest what I should look for next in my network? >> >> Thanks in advance >> Tony Nelson >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <font size="1"> >> <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in >> 0in 1.0pt 0in'> >> </div> >> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient >> and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >> any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email >> and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by >> return email and delete this email from your system." >> </font> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ntop mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >> > > > > > > > <font size="1"> > <div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in > 0in 1.0pt 0in'> > </div> > "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > </font> > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
