ok, so i will try to upgrade my pf-ring source to 4498 and will tell the result.
thank you for your quick response.
cheers!
Jasper Spaans wrote:
> Probably, so I'd recommend trying rev 4498 or better.
> (Going from 4494 to 4498 should not require a kernel module recompile,
> but I believe one of the later revisions adds the watermark feature
> which does change the API)
> On 08/03/11 10:56, M. V. wrote:
>
> > my pf-ring revision is 4494. so you think this has caused the problem?
> >
> >
> > Jasper Spaans wrote:
> > > What svn revision are you using? I saw similar problems in my own code
> > > using the libpcap supplied with pf-ring, which did not have the patch of
> > > revision 4498 applied.
> > >
> > > Jasper
> > >
> > >On 08/03/11 09:45, M. V. wrote:
> > > > in order to boost capturing performance, i installed PF-Ring for
> > > > libpcap on Debian-6.0 using the link below. i got latest version of
> > > > pf-ring from svn, and recompiled my intel-card's driver to support
> > > > pf_ring. i didn't get any error or problem during the process.
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
