Tcpdump extract: notice all the 1464 byte packets are F'd, others OK:

15:16:24.818262 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 252, id 14766, offset 0, flags [none], proto: 
UDP (17), length: 1012) 10.15.26.200.50769 > 
monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 984

15:16:28.822210 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 251, id 14766, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 1396) 10.15.26.200.50769 > monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: 
[bad udp cksum 55bc!] UDP, length 1464

15:16:39.822211 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 252, id 14766, offset 0, flags [none], proto: 
UDP (17), length: 1060) 10.15.26.200.50769 > 
monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 1032

15:16:46.822499 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 251, id 14766, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 1396) 10.15.26.200.50769 > monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: 
[bad udp cksum 6409!] UDP, length 1464

15:16:50.821026 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 251, id 14766, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 1396) 10.15.26.200.50769 > monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: 
[bad udp cksum 9a8e!] UDP, length 1464

15:16:55.819812 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 251, id 14766, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP 
(17), length: 1396) 10.15.26.200.50769 > monpapp1.waddell.com.netflow-Regn15: 
[bad udp cksum 2191!] UDP, length 1464

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ntop] Cisco netflow packet size - adjusting?

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 14:37 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> Anyone know how to force the Cisco IOS, specifically netflow, to use
> packet sizes smaller than 1464 bytes?  It doesn't seem to be honoring
> the MTU size of the interfaces.  It gets fragmented and then Checksum
> is invalid, and then ntop doesn't see the packets. Annoying....

Um, gets fragmented by *what* and where?  Fragmentation isn't *supposed*
to corrupt datagrams, by what is the checksum being invalid being
reported?

Also, whence 1464? The maximum UDP payload on a standard 1500 byte MTU
Ethernet-like network is 1472 bytes before the IPv4 datagram carrying
the UDP datagram carrying the user message has to be fragmented.  Does
your network have a smaller than 1500 byte MTU?

While IP fragmentation is indeed frowned upon, "not honoring the MTU
size" is a bit strong - UDP-using applications can indeed send messages
large enough to require fragmentation by IP.  For example EDNS in DNS
will do so, and it isn't considered dishonorable :)

rick jones

> I've googled for hours and haven't found anything yet. 
> 
> TIA 
> 
> Gary 
> 
> Tags: netflow, ntop, exporter not recognized, cant see netflow traffic
> 
> 
> 
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
> and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and
> its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
> email and delete this email from your system." 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop


_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop





<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop

Reply via email to