> Don't really know, but I believe Luca runs Solaris on both.
>
> Questions -
>
> 1. If you locate libiconv, do you find it on the various systems?
>
On 2 out of 3 systems I've tried it on. (So no pattern)
> 2. Which gd are you using? Hand compiled, or the binary from Sun Freeware?
> (It could be that they have the dependency (and maybe are the source of
> libiconv too, for that matter).
Binary from SunFreeware because all these systems had MRTG installed first.
>
> 3. You might try something fancy in the configureextra/SOLARIS9 file. In
> the redhat9, I've got an example of using an if to test for something:
>
> echo " Setting RedHat 9 specific flag values"
> CPPFLAGS="-DHAVE_FILEDESCRIPTORBUG ${CPPFLAGS}"
>
..
..
> would something like this work across all systems???
>
> if test -f /usr/lib/libiconv.so; then
> LIBS="-liconv ${LIBS}"
> fi
>
>
Like I said having the libiconv is not the determining factor, I actaully
wrote something like that as a test with pkginfo SMCiconv. But one system I
tried it on DID NOT have the libiconv package installed and still failed the
gd test so having that switch will not solve the problem. The dependency
could be in GD but looks like at least one other person who built by hand
has this problem also so....I'll poke around at it again when I have
sometime but at least we know that 2.2.96 works with a few small tweaks.
> -----Burton
>
--
Mike Tremaine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stellarcore.net
_______________________________________________
Ntop mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
