Don't know - I don't have $4K to spend on software for testing this. It should work - there aren't any version specific dependencies. Unless RH changed the package names...
You might need to rebuild the rpm. That's fairly standard moving between rpm based releases, e.g.: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2003-March/msg00340.html. (Or, the shortcut: rpmbuild --rebuild|--recompile SOURCEPKG ... When invoked this way, rpmbuild installs the named source package, and does a prep, compile and install. In addi- tion, --rebuild builds a new binary package. When the build has completed, the build directory is removed (as in --clean) and the the sources and spec file for the package are removed. ) -----Burton -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mon Yang Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:20 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Ntop] Ntop 3.2 rc1 released Does it work for Redhat Enterprise 4? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burton Strauss Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 8:27 PM To: Ntop; [email protected] Subject: [Ntop] Ntop 3.2 rc1 released The cvs is updated and the .tgz plus a Fedora Core 2 .rpm are available at SourceForge. Too many changes to list... Give it a try, we would like to release 3.2 as soon as possible. The more testing, the better. I may be able to get binary packages for other platforms up soon (the FC2 .rpm should work for FC3 and FC4). No promises, however... -----Burton _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
