And again i seem to have given this question a kiss of death.... can anyone help?
Thanks Chris On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 18:18 +0100, Chris Phillips wrote: > I was the one that originally asked about this, and i'm using rhel 4.2. > in my case it's actually whenever the ntop daemon is started, not just > from specifically clearing statistics. > > Cheers > > Chris > > On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 15:18 -0500, Gary Gatten wrote: > > Hmmmm, how about don't reset the stats? :-) Just kidding. > > > > Can't offer much help - sorry. Maybe you could edit the rrd files and > > remove those sample so they don't sqew the real data. Or, disable the > > rrd files before resetting the stats? Not sure if this would help or > > just lead to more probs. Wish I could help more, but like most others > > I'm running on *nix systems not Window$. > > > > Gary > > > > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/22/2006 2:17 PM >>> > > Hello all! > > > > > > > > I'm running ntop 3.2 on win32, which, except for one problem, is > > working > > extraordinarily well. > > > > > > > > Just after I reset stats (using the Admin menu), ntop processes an > > enormous > > amount of "phantom traffic." rrd shows a huge spike in traffic -- I'm > > just > > monitoring 2 T1's, but it briefly shoots up to 60-100 Mbytes/sec! The > > really odd thing is that most, but not all, of the monitored protocols > > basically have an equal share of the bandwidth. > > > > > > > > For example, I just reset my stats and got the following readings: > > > > > > > > BitTorrent: 13.8M > > > > DHCP-BOOTP: 13.8M > > > > DNS: 13.8M > > > > eDonkey: 0.0 > > > > Gnutella: 13.7M > > > > HTTP: 13.7M > > > > Kazaa: 0.0 > > > > Mail: 13.8M > > > > Messenger: 0.0 > > > > NBios-IP: 13.8M > > > > NFS_AFS: 0.0 > > > > SNMP: 13.8M > > > > SSH: 0.0 > > > > X11: 0.0 > > > > > > > > Someone on this list experienced the same issue (back in mid-July). I > > contacted him directly, but this is still an open issue. If anyone > > knows > > anything about this problem, I would be eternally grateful. > > > > > > > > This wouldn't be a much of a problem, but it messes up my graphs -- due > > to > > the severe disparity in bandwidth between 2 T-1's and 100Mbytes/sec > > (the > > real data is shrunk to nothingness). Any help/hints would be greatly > > appreciated! Even if you're not sure and just have a hunch, please let > > me > > know. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dan > > > > > > =========================================================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > > return email and delete this email from your system." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ntop mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop > > _______________________________________________ > Ntop mailing list > [email protected] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop _______________________________________________ Ntop mailing list [email protected] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop
