http://www.radiolabs.com/products/wireless/wifi-bridge-kits.php
Jean-Paul Natola ________________________________ > From: nfs_j...@hotmail.com > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > Subject: [NTSysADM] Wireless Bridge Equip / Vendor Recommendations > Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 19:35:11 +0000 > > Good Afternoon > Full Disclosure: I am a software engineer so I understand generally > this field but I am not as well versed in the particulars as you guys > are. > > > A friend who owns a very large dairy has broadband coming into one > building and would like to beam wireless to their house across the > street ~100 yards away. I was looking for advice as well as what > equipment / where to buy. It *seems* to me this is not needing a > complex solution. They will not be uploading much just downloading. > > So any advice would be greatly appreciated > JB > > Homeschooled kids don’t lack socialization . . . but socialism. > Homeschooling represents a microcosm of traditional Americana and a > rebuke of government meddling. Hence liberals hate it. > Source: > http://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2013/01/22/want-to-tell-the-state-to-stick-it-homeschool-your-kids/ > > > > > ________________________________ > Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:58:47 -0500 > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] AD groups - Global, or Universal? > From: dangerw...@gmail.com > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com > > Universal is typically used more for inter-forest ACL's IIRC. Reason > #1 I can think of for Global vs. Uni is your GC's have to replicate any > change to Uni group membership. > > This probably explains it better than I did: > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/231273 > > That said for your size, and the administrative effort to make the > change it's probably not worth it. > > > - WJR > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 1:09 PM, David Lum > <david....@nwea.org<mailto:david....@nwea.org>> wrote: > > I seem to think it was from this list that helped me decide to no use > Global groups in AD but I have an SE pointing me to MS articles and it > looks like I should be using Global instead on Universal, – currently I > use Domain local and Universal groups, but we’re pretty small > (600-users) and have two forests, but the majority of the accesses I am > concerned about are users from DOMAIN1 getting access to local > resources (file shares and servers) in DOMAIN1. > > > > Is there a compelling reason to use Global vs. Universal? Somehow I was > thinking global as much for backward-compatibility, but am not finding > anything online saying as much. > > David Lum > Sr. Systems Engineer // NWEATM > Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 > > >
