Now that you and Michael mention it - it does ring of that type of an issue. I need to confirm the settings on the switch port.
Thanks! On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:40 PM, mck1012 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sounds like a speed/duplex mismatch. I would try to hard code both the > servers and the switch to 100 or 1000 /full if that does not work set the > servers to auto, I have seen problems on some server NIC's and switches when > both are set to 100/Full and network transfers are slow. > > Micheal Espinola Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I"m seeing something peculiar with robocopy, and quite the opposite of > anything I have seen before or would expect. I am performing a simple > robocopy mirror copy between two servers. When these servers were > attached to different uplinked switches, copy time/performance was as > expected. > > I recently moved one of the servers so that it is connected to the > same switch, and apparently all copy-related performance has become > abismal - with network utilization staying below 1% ! Previously, > when connected to an up-linked switch, the utilization would peak > close to 50% during a large file copy. This happens with robocopy as > well as an Windows GUI copy. > > The switches involved are Cisco 3560's. Both servers are currently > attached to the same, while with the prior placement one of the > servers was attached to a different 3560 that is up-linked via SFP. > > I'm currently at a loss as to why this is occuring. Any suggestions/ideas? > > TIA! > > -- > ME2 > > ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ > ~ ~ > > -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja! ~ ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm> ~
